Talk:Smallville season 2

Smallville season 2 received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Television: Episode coverage Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Comics: Superman C‑class Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Superman work group.

Overview[edit]

The overview needs to be overhauled. As with the other seasons it contains too much information. It is like reading the episodes, only placed all together in one paragraph. It should only contain the major plot arcs for that season. Bignole 05:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episode notability[edit]

Many or all of the existing individual episode pages for this series fail notability guidelines, including the notability guidelines for television episodes, and have been tagged accordingly. Might I suggest these articles are improved with real-world information from reliable sources to assert notability. Trivia, quotes and overly long plot summaries should be removed. You might consider merging any notable information onto the list of episodes or season pages. Otherwise, when these pages come up for review in fourteen days, they may be redirected, merged or deleted. If you want any help or further information, then come to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Episode coverage. Thanks. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link Relevancy[edit]

I'm not quite sure what relevancy queer secrecy has to the Smallville TV series. This type of speculation isn't exactly relevant. I don't believe the queer secrecy links belong attached to the series. It might be relevant to the writer of the article, but I just don't see Matthew Shepard and Clark Kent in the same boat. Lastly, the linked article doesn't even have its ducks in a row. It features factual errors, including the repeated misspelling of Shepard's name as Shepherd. Does seeing Clark on a cross really lead queer viewers to think of Matthew Shepard? This article sounds more like one man's POV, trying to speak for the gay community. Relevant? .stevefdl

It's called a literary analysis of the show. It doesn't matter if you don't like it, or if they get their "factual errors" wrong. It's additional information which cannot be implemented into the article in a sufficient manner, mainly because we don't have a themes section that will cover more than just one person's analysis of the show. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 00:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good article[edit]

How is it that this episode hasn't been nominated/awarded good article status. It is incredibly well written and sourced much like season one.Russell [ Talk ] 14:35, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It actually is in need of a copyedit. The plot summaries need fixing big time (they are a little too vague and don't read well), and there isn't a true reception section for this season (yet). That's why it hasn't been nominated for GA. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this still need to be done? ChaosMaster_Chat 02:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, since I never got around to it. I know the plot section needs to be reworked as well. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 03:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Smallville (season 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Skinwalkers (Smallville episode)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Skinwalkers (Smallville episode). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 09:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]