Talk:Silverado Fire

Silverado Fire was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 20, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wildfire Low‑importance

	Silverado Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Droughts / Wildfires

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Droughts and wildfires task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Silverado fire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 23:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate your contributions to the article, it meets the quick fail criteria due to failing MOS:LEAD (info in the lead should also be in the article) and other issues—I suspect it may not meet the broadness criteria and would suggest expansion from reliable sources. (t · c) buidhe 23:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]