Talk:Shy Tory factor

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

In need of updates?[edit]

Has the 'shy labour effect' finally come to play? Nil Einne (talk) 19:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is bad[edit]

There was no shy tory factor in the last UK election. The massive section on that even includes the fact that there was a report done investigating the polling error. There was, and the polling found among other things that there was no shy tory factor. We have no evidence at all that there was a shy tory factor in the US election, but a cartoonist reckons there was? Excuse me? There needs to be a pretty big rewrite of this article as it is currently at odds with expert opinion.Awoma (talk) 13:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graph needs a key[edit]

The graph is a little bit unclear and needs a key to explain what exactly it means. This is Paul (talk) 20:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]