Talk:Shhh (Chumbawamba album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested moves[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move all pages. Armbrust The Homunculus 20:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


– Collecting two related problems on the same RM: [1] neither Shhh (Chumbawumba album) nor Shhh! (Kumbia Kings album) are likely WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Shhh". (cf. similar problems with mettle, results, strategem, recycler, percolater, desideratum, stairways, swansong, nihil...). Shhh and Shhh! should both redirect to dab SHH. [2] The SHH dab list includes acronyms but also many "Shh" and "Shhh" topics. Currently Shh redirects to Sonic the hedgehog (which is not Sonic the Hedgehog). Either SHH should move over Shh or alternatively Shh redirect to the dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. The imperative form would be a command for silence. All shh/shhh/shhh... forms should redirect to the disambiguation page, with how many additional exclamation points tacked on. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, per the nominator. ╠╣uw [talk] 09:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. All uses are appropriately distinguished by natural, recognizable and WP:COMMONNAME spellings. This is a solution seeking a problem. --В²C 06:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • support per nom Agathoclea (talk) 09:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. When used to silence someone, the phrase "shhh" is an imperative, so it should not be surprising to find an exclamation point at the end of it. Therefore, the exclamation point can't be said to distinguish this from other forms. bd2412 T 14:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. The tiny typographical differences are insufficient DAB and are probably not consistently followed in sources. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.