Talk:Shepseskare/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 18:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
This article is clearly of GA standard, and with the smallest of tweaks will meet the GA criteria in full.
- Cardinal numbers: for numbers up to and including 10 it is usual to write them in words, so that in the lead "reigned for 7 years" would be "reigned for seven years", and so on through the text.
- "However" – ignoring one in a quotation, there are four "howevers" in your main text, all of which, in my opinion, are unnecessary and just clog up your prose. The meaning would be just as clear without them.
- WP:ENGVAR: The article is mostly in AmEng, but a few BrEng spellings have crept in:
- "emphasises" (for "emphasizes")
- "levelled" (for "leveled")
- "analysing" (for "analyzing").
- Bibliography
- The Wright link is dead
- The older books (pre-ISBN) should preferably have OCLC numbers added, which you can easily find at WorldCat. I have added one for the Jacquet-Gordon book as an example.
- The ISBNs are a mishmash of 10 and 13 digit versions, and some are hyphenated and some aren't. I don't regard addressing this as essential for GA, but if you are thinking of going on to FAC you'll need to fix this.
Those are my only suggestions. A fine article. – Tim riley talk 18:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Overall summary[edit]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: