Talk:Second Great Fire of London

Military history: British / European / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Firefighting Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 29, 2019 and December 29, 2020.

Fair use rationale for Image:StPaulsCathedral.jpg[edit]

Image:StPaulsCathedral.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

— Save_Us_229 22:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Mason Photograph[edit]

I have uploaded an image of the Mason photograph again and linked to it. It seems the previous image was deleted because no rationale had been provided, not because the rationale was invalid. Thincat (talk) 14:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warsaw picture ?[edit]

Why is there a picture of Warsaw at the bottom of the page ? ThePro (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Air Raid Damage in Britain during the Second World War HU36220A.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Number of bombs[edit]

The quoted figures don't add up - 136 bombers with an average of 180 bombs per plane doesn't make up 100,000 bombs but a quarter of that number. Geopersona (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I immediately noticed that as well. Would be good to fix. Not logged in from work and don't have new sources to cite, so not editing the main article text -- Martin L Buchanan. 65.126.101.58 (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evie mea[edit]

Y is fire bigger then the other fire 90.214.245.147 (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]