Talk:Seagalogy

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Untitled[edit]

I created this article about the book recently published about the martial arts actor Steven Seagal for the same reason someone would create an article for a new movie by Steven Seagal. It is for general interest and as an interesting item relating to a person of cultural prominence in the world today. I do not work for the publishers or know the author or Steven Seagal or anyone related to this - but I own the book and it's really good. Why would it be blatant advertising to have an article about this book and not be blatant advertising to have an article about any of his movies? I have also inserted a reference on the main Steven Seagal page saying that this book exists.

I have removed the quotes from reviews for the book, as I can see that that makes it seem like this article exists to promote the book. How should I ensure that the article does not break any regulations regarding advertising? I believe that an entry for this book should exist on wikipedia.

Assert it's notability on the article and add sources and references UKWikiGuy (talk) 12:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added many reviews and citations as suggested by the previous editor. The book is notable as it is the first and (as of March 2014), ONLY exhaustive study of Steven Seagal's filmography. That makes it absolutely relevant and completely inescapable for any discussion of the topic. Every one of Seagal's films has it's own wiki page, and this book is only in-depth study which ties them together thematically, making it relevant to most if not all of those films. Obviously, not every book of film criticism deserves its own wiki page, but given the uniqueness of this one and the unusual theory which it forwards, I think Seagalogy is one that doesMr Subtlety (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]