Talk:Scott Rosenberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External Links Silliness[edit]

"However, his profiling of people with disabilities takes away from the perfection of this film. It certainly is shocking that a Jewish man doesn't have the sensitivity to not profile other minorities. A line from Beautiful Girls, "It's like a 'mental patient' who doesn't know that he's 'mental.'" Profiling of individuals as "mental" or "mental patient" is demeaning and is a form of hate language. Scott Rosenburg could have eliminated this line and had a beautiful movie; instead, it is a turn--off---a crass jab at those least able to defend themselves---folks with disabilities." 67.168.235.225 22-Nov 2007

Should this be erased? Personally I think it's silly and fun. On the other hand, It's poor film criticism. Also it's not entirely factual; Jews definitely profile minorities and Beautiful Girls (film) falls short of beautiful in more ways than its use of the word mental. Less important, isn't this POV and not wiki-kosher? Anyone want to cyber? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usernamism (talkcontribs) 03:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scott Rosenberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]