Talk:Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo (1979 TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with Image:Scoob-scrap-1980.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Scoob-scrap-1980.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suckage and Failure[edit]

The most obviously missing part of this article is about the complete failure of this concept and in general how badly this show sucked. As well it could delve into how "adding a cute new character" to shows is an indicator that they have already failed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.14.152 (talk) 14:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 November 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo (1979 TV series)Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo – The title without parentheses is currently a disambiguation page, but it shouldn't be. All the other entries are either partial title matches or aren't even similar to the primary title and should be removed. I'd have removed them already, but that seemed dishonest to do while also proposing this move. -- Fyrael (talk) 16:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral, but keep the dab page. The other series, while not called "Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo" exactly, are often confused with the 1979 series, so it's helpful to still have the dab page exist even if it's at Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo (disambiguation). Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see any entries there that satisfy MOS:DABNOENTRY. The fact that they involve similar characters doesn't mean they belong on a disambiguation page. -- Fyrael (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. And I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for these pesky move requests! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, and in any result keep the dab page. The (1979 TV series) is helpful. Even Scooby Doo experts would be hard pressed to distinguish. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The 1980-1983 shorts were repackaged under the "Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo" banner (even using the 1979 opening credits) and have been shown around the world under that title for decades now. This is covered under the article Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo (1980 TV series) which wasn't on the disambiguation page until now. Timrollpickering (talk) 11:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Proposed title may also refer to, respectively, Scooby-Doo (character) and Scrappy-Doo... and the short-lived duo gimmick lasting from 1979 to early 1980s in numerous shows. The dabpage can already give readers an impression about the talking puppy... and the naming gimmicks. George Ho (talk) 23:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.