Talk:Scene generator

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scene generator article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 22 October 2018 with the comment:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement.
It was contested by Djm-leighpark (talk · contribs) on 2018-10-26 with the comment:
As directed search seems to yield a spread of relevant results plus adding to WikiProject Physics may be very relevant Article in need of improvement though.

Significant Results[edit]

this search seems to yield quality results

Confirming no apparent Copyright issue[edit]

When adding the cite/reference Raytheon-2011 / I was concerned the wording in the cited article was very close to that currently used on the Wikipedia article. That on the Wikipedia article has been in place since 2007; the reference Raytheon-2011 seems from 2011 and appears a slight improvement on the Wikipedia version. As that dates from 2011 I do not find Wikipedia has breached the copyright of that reference when the content was created on Wikipedia 2007.Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scene generator DAB[edit]

Still have some concerns the disambiguation hatnote sending to Mockup is a little bit of a WP:SURPRISE at that article as it doesn't really describe Mockup/Scene generator; and if I could confidently add a section to the Mockup article with a reasonable refer I would (sometimes an ... ah yes .. that'll work may come to me). Overall I think we are better with the hatnote than without it, but improvement (somewhere) is needed. There also be be a case for renaming the article to Steam Generator(computer model) but I'm not convinced enough to formally propose that.Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]