Talk:Savage Wolverine

Merge

I don't think there is any value in having this as a separate article. It contains no information that can't be covered at Wolverine_(comic_book)#Savage_Wolverine, and it's hardly as if that article is overlong. Morwen (Talk) 14:12, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

the title named "wolverine" has been ended as announced by marvel. this is a brand new title called "savage wolverine" . how can putting information of this title in an article name wolverine (comic book) can be right?? can you tell me ?? is putting information of A in B instead of A is right? and regarding this article length then i want to say that as mentioned this title is set to debut in january 2013 and then there will be new arcs and new developments and then this article will start to grow in a size. how can article grow when there is still one month to left for debut of this comic book? --Shoxee1214 (talk) 17:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Well, just 'cos they've stuck a new and exciting adjective at the front of the title does not, in my view, indicate that it's worth a separate article, any more than we have separate articles for Iron Man (comic book), Invincible Iron Man, Iron Man: Director of SHIELD, etc. The way that titles change back and forth is certainly confusing and makes it hard to figure out what is what, but in this case, I'd say it's pretty straightforward that this is wolverine vol 6 under another name. We can merge it back and and then if it gets too big trivially split it out to a separate article. I'm going to do the redirect now. Morwen (Talk) 18:47, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh, wow, we do in fact have an article about Invincible Iron Man, which makes no mention of that being the title that Warren Ellis's run used. Sigh. Morwen (Talk) 18:52, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

yeah you are the boss maybe you are right. but i think savage wolverine really do deserve separate article . and i dont think new adjective putting thing is worth redirecting this . savaga wolverine is a new and separate title and its good being separate. --Shoxee1214 (talk) 19:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not the boss. I'm just an interested Wikipedian! If I can't form a consensus then I don't have the right to do anything. If you're that worried, I won't do it. But as I said in the other place, I do think we should come up with some guidelines for deciding when to have separate articles about titles, teams and characters. Morwen (Talk) 19:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

he dont get me wrong i was not attacking you . i like yourself is really interested and trying to do best for comics related wikipedias . and yeah you can give me some of your ideas regarding articles and then i'll tell mine . in this way we can be helpful for wikipeda . Regards--Shoxee1214 (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I withdraw my suggestion. Morwen (Talk) 20:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)