Talk:Sao Shwe Thaik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Correction of English[edit]

I have cleaned up and corrected the English in the original article - I have not, however, checked the facts presented on this subject.

need to write more about his biography[edit]

i think , he deserve to be written aout him here , any have knowledge aout shan , plese help us.

Inaccuracies[edit]

1) The coats of arms shown in the article was apparently not that of Sao Shwe Thaik. It was that of the socialist government led by U Ne Win (1962-1998) that toppled the parlimentary government led by U Nu (1948-1962) of which Sao Shwe Thike was the head of the state. The pinion and the paddy crops are apparently the symbols for socialism. (Somehow, this coats of arms is still being used by the present military government of Maynmar.)

2) Sao Shwe Thaik was not the head of the state during the whole period of 1948-1962. There was another person named Mun Win Maung (an ethnic Karin) who served as the president (head of the state) of Myanmar for some years (although I don't exactly remember from where to where). Zeyaraun 02:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

references[edit]

Do we have sufficient references for this article? RJFJR (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:ShweThek .jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:ShweThek .jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

Are we sure that စဝ် is pronounced /saʔ/? I'm not familiar with this word, and it isn't listed at [1], but I would have thought /sɔ̀/ or /sɔ́/ would be more likely. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 12:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Hintha: in case this isn't on his watchlist. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 12:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Let me also answer since I'm the one who entered the current IPA. The word စဝ် is not a Burmese name or a common Burmese spelling. Though it's pronounced like စပ် in Burmese, I suspect the actual (Southern) Shan pronunciation is probably closer to the English transliteration of Sao. Now, as to why the Burmese pronunciation doesn't more closely follow the Shan one, one explanation I've heard--though from a non-Shan speaker--is that it sounds too similar to စောက်, a (mild) swear word in Burmese. Something like /sauʔ ʃwè θaiʔ/ or even /sao ʃwè θaiʔ/ would sound bad (or funny) to Burmese ears, and elicit groans/giggles. Now, to your point, could the Burmese pronunciation have been tweaked to စော (Saw, /sɔ́/) instead of စပ်? I suppose--especially since both Saw and Sao probably are related, and used to be royal titles. Alas, စဝ် is pronounced like စပ် in modern Burmese. Hybernator (talk) 19:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sao Shwe Thaik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]