Talk:Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Meena Kumari and Rehman (Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam).png[edit]

Image:Meena Kumari and Rehman (Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam).png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 01:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Guru Dutt (Sahib Biwi aur Ghulam).png[edit]

The image Image:Guru Dutt (Sahib Biwi aur Ghulam).png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • "who also co-star" → "who also co-stars"
  • "V. K. Murthy in Andheri and Dhakuria completed the principal photography" → "Principal photography took place in Andheri and Dhakuria with cinematographer V. K. Murthy" or "Principal photography took place in Andheri and Dhakuria with director of photography V. K. Murthy"
  • "at the its factory" – reword
  • "an trainee" → "a trainee"
  • "he was surprise" → "he was surprised"
  • "concentrated on the screenplay writing" → "concentrated on writing the screenplay"
  • "he arrived for" → "he arrived"
  • "had potential to boost her career" → "had the potential to boost her career"
  • Add a comma after "Bibi for Kumari".
  • "consectitive" → "consecutive"
  • "with adding" → "by adding"
  • Remove the comma after "a new climax".
  • "by both" → "from both"
  • "last major contribution for" → "last major contribution to"
  • The non-free use rationales for every image look good.
  • Checked most sources; everything is properly cited. Great work on this article!
  • Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Done. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed