Talk:SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs: Tactical Strike

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

RE: Copy Vio[edit]

Remade the page. You could have just reverted the copyrighted material. But it is a Legit game --Cs california 09:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wow someone needs to create a good page for this since its like out —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.205.137 (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New cover[edit]

You guys need to put the box art on the page because we all know that's not what it looks like. I would but I don't know how. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.161.227 (talk) 04:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the list of weapons in the game removed? If you wanna buy a game you're gonna want to know what you're firepower options are - is it worth my while to re-insert a list of weapons or will it jus b deleted again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.145.131 (talk) 23:29, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wall of text storyline.[edit]

Seriously. Thats unreadable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.198.204.144 (talk) 11:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Content[edit]

Can somebody PLEASE put a watch on this? First the weapons list dissapeared (yet it's perfectly fine for fireteam bravo 3) and then somebody deletes any mention of the games better ratings in exchange for poorer ratings from reviewers I've never heard of. I've a suspicion that a certain kind of person who likes FPSs too much is vandalising it because they didn't take the time to learn the greatness of this game as a strategy game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.97.233.99 (talk) 23:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, a list of weapons shouldn't be in a Wikipedia article, as per Wikipedia:NOTGUIDE. If there was a notable weapon that large parts of the gameplay hinged upon, such as Half-Life 2's Gravity Gun, that would deserve mention. Real-world weapons, with no unusual functionality or signifigance, don't derserve to be listed here.
More importantly, since "Metacritic" has Tactical Strike averaging at 72%, I feel the current selection of reviews adequately reflects this score. Michael Baptista (talk) 23:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]