Talk:SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unclear link[edit]

APA is unclear. Which specific article is of interest, please? - Denimadept (talk) 17:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's the Asset Purchase Agreement signed between Novell and Santa Cruz; it's actually not on that list, and there shouldn't be a link. I've tried to make this clear in the article. Superm401 - Talk 14:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about the legal status of OpenSolaris?[edit]

I'm wondering about the legal status of OpenSolaris in this case. In particular, hasn't Sun/Oracle obtained and paid for the rights to open source the Unix parts of Solaris in OpenSolaris from SCO; rights that SCO didn't possess, according to the jury decision on March 30th 2010? -- Cghost (talk) 23:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have to be careful of Original Research here. if you have a press story about it, I don't see why they can't have a quick blurb (although I tend to think that the major part of anything about it should be in any article about OpenSolaris. SirFozzie (talk) 23:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Cleanup[edit]

I gave the page the general cleanup it was flagged for, as well as a good copy edit. It's now organized chronologically, similar to other notable case articles. I added a number of headings to make the text more accessible and easier to read, though if anyone has better titles for the headings, I'm not in love with them. Added an infobox. Gave the article a good lead. Added more background, particularly establishing how Novell came to own the UNIX rights. Still needs someone to go through Groklaw and add more citations. Macwhiz (talk) 00:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:SCO_Group,_Inc._v._Novell,_Inc.&oldid=1210277485"