This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
I think this is the most WP:COMMONNAME for this device. In addition the current name Rubidium standard is confusing because it is also used for standard chemical lab purity samples of rubidium metal used in spectroscopy. ChetvornoTALK 12:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to make the move within a week unless some persuasive reason not to appears. --ChetvornoTALK 13:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Sounds reasonable to me. Erictalk 18:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support: @Chetvorno: Sounds reasonable to me as well! (The last person didn't remind you by pinging at all if Chetvorno forgot, but I know my message is way later than one week.) 207.81.187.41 (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should drop by "to 0.1%" rather than "by 0.1%"?[edit]
I don't want to make an edit here as I am not sure of my expertise, but I believe the absorption is by a factor of 1000 at resonance. Dkazdan (talk) 22:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, no expertise here on my part either, but as I read the current text, if I invent a new unit of intensity called the "whatever", the intensity is diminished slightly by the microwave exposure, from 1,000 whatevers to 999 whatevers. I think "to 0.1%" would mean the intensity is being almost extinguished, down to 1 whatever. So it depends on which is the case (assuming I properly understood the context). Erictalk 01:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]