Talk:Ron Reagan/Archives/2016

Is he a pariah?

Is he isolated from the rest of the Reagans because of his political ideology? 204.184.80.26 (talk) 19:31, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

My short answer is no. He and Patti Davis are the only children of the surviving Reagan Nancy so I would think she would favor her own children with Reagan. Patti is politically close to Ron. Ron and his Mom agree on stem-cell research and they love his father. Maureen died so she can't be holding any political grudges. This leaves the adopted son of Jane Wyman, Michael, who is much more conservative than the 2 children of Nancy and Ronald Reagan. So this only leaves Michael to be at odds with. Even if Michael doesn't like Ron's politics, "pariah" would not be appropriate. Just my opinion. --Javaweb (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Javaweb

Speaking as an adopted child, your opinion that Nancy would have less favor for an adopted child disgusting. Just my opinion. 184.10.250.122 (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

That is not my opinion. My point was that he was not raised by Ms Reagan, he was raised by Ms. Wyman. He is not a child of Nancy Reagan. He is a child, adopted or not, of Jane Wyman and did not reside with Nancy Reagan. I'm crossing out "adopted" since it is not relevant here. Thank you for pointing that out.

An adopted child's parents explicitly chose to have that child so I believe adopted children are at least as loved as any child.

--Javaweb (talk) 23:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Javaweb

A recent Am Heritage definition of that word uses terms: "social outcast"; a member of a caste "very low" in India, or the "untouchables" (1949). To imply that this type of stigmatization has been conferred on Mr. Reagan by the family, and I would need to know more, but I would suggest that it is an inaccurate viewing, if not wholly inaccurate. (...) I have seen Ron on TV, during the last decade, defending his Dad, and his father's Presidency, eloquently and passionately. To suggest he is a person in a sense 'cast out' is, imo, entirely a misconception. (John G. Lewis (talk) 19:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ron Reagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.esquire.com/cgi-bin/printtool/print.cgi?pages=5&filename=%2Ffeatures%2Farticles%2F2004%2F040729_mfe_reagan.html&x=38&y=16

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)