Talk:Roman Hruska

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

Defender of the strong[edit]

The "google hits test" is one of the most damaging and LEAST scholarly methods one finds used by some editors of wikipedia. it makes wikipedia shallow and is the cause of many inappropriate inclusions and exclusions in wikipedia texts and this article and the deletion of the "defender of the strong" for Hruska is a perfect example.

this is the term used in CQ (an authoritative biography source for members of Congress) from the late 1960's.

One can also find it on google news citing The New Republic: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%2BHruska+%2BStrong+%2Bdefender&scoring=t&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1968&as_hdate=1968&lnav=dt — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.75.36.119 (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google book search and Amazon A9 book search both turn up ZERO hits. The idea that he is "widely known" as a "Defender of the Strong" (capitalized!) when the only source one can turn up is a generalized allusion in one minor column in a 1968 New Republic is faintly ridiculous - particularly when a main point of the article is that he is best known for precisely the opposite (that is, defender of mediocrity). zafiroblue05 | Talk 21:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, the monicker makes little sense, or is a backhand insult: since when do "the Strong" particularly need defending? Patzer42 (talk) 18:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Puppies reference[edit]

I know the reference, but I've no idea what the point of it is. An explanation would be useful. - Denimadept (talk) 15:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Ogden Edsl just liked the sound of a name that was harder to spell than his own? Asat (talk) 10:52, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]