This article was nominated for deletion on 30 March 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
I just noticed that two tags were removed from this article without an edit summary or a discussion--"orphan" and "advert". I'm adding the orphan tag back on for now, as it doesn't appear to have any mainspace pages that link here. The latter can probably stay off, as I've deleted the advertising like material. As big an Aung San Suu Kyi fan as I am, quotes from photocopied letters on the author's own website don't appear to me to meet our criteria for reliable sources; it would be better to find published reviews in reliable third-party publications. And preferably a blend of negative with the positive, unless this got universally rave reviews. I've also more clearly indicated that the quote in the intro is only the opinion of an individual reviewer, and not Wikipedia 's summary of the book. Hopefully that'll take care of the advert-like tone. -- Khazar (talk) 14:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
