Talk:Richard Dawkins/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   This well written and follows the Wikipedia MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I added two requested citations. This article is well referenced to reliable sources and I can find no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I have no hesitation in confirming that this article meets the Good Article criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)