Talk:Replicant (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Replicant.jpg[edit]

Image:Replicant.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Metal121, please stop blanking categories. Per WP:FILMCAT, we categorize films by year and language by default. Per WP:BRD, please stop edit warring to remove them when someone has disputed their removal. Instead, try talking on the talk page. The name of the template is also {{Rotten Tomatoes}}. Could you explain why you're replacing it with a redirect? That seems kind of pointless. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 December 2015[edit]

add Replicant (disambiguation) at the top { { other uses } } 189.202.88.229 (talk) 14:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - thanks for the suggestion - Arjayay (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last sentence in synopsis is nonsensical/misleading[edit]

The article says "The Replicant is dating Hooker (Marnie Alton) as the film ends." This sentence makes it seem as if Hooker was the character's name. For what I can tell, though, the character remained unnamed within the movie, but she definitely was meant to be a "hooker" (a prostitute) by profession. 2003:DE:E3FE:C400:B9F9:FD9B:B909:1AA6 (talk) 23:19, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]