Talk:René Guénon/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 06:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am quickfailing this article. It has many entire paragraphs (some of which are quite lengthy) without any citations. Since each paragraph in a well structured article is suppose to present a new idea. Each idea needs a citation to adhere to WP:V, WP:RS and WP:ATT.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article is quite extensive at 68KB. It is so long that serious consideration should be given to WP:SPLIT and WP:SIZE.Some sections might be better if they were presented as separate articles with a summary here.
WP:LEAD is quite brief (807KB of readable prose) for an article that maxes out the length. This LEAD should be in the neighborhood of 3000-3200KB.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The LEAD should include a summary of each section of the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please review WP:CAPTION. This article has many very lengthy CAPTIONS and violates the Wording subsection of the article in a few places.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
These are but of few of the things that need to be worked on before this article is ready to be a WP:GA. Please review the GA criteria at WP:WIAGA before renominating this article at WP:GAC.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am FAILING this article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'm not finished with the article, I'll try to correct it according to what is listed here. - TwoHorned _{User_talk:TwoHorned} 21:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]