Talk:Regional designations of Montana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

I'm recommending that we merge Eastern Montana and Western Montana into this article. Both are poorly sourced, rambling articles and at times become drama magnets. There is no single consistent definition for either, so might as well put them here and improve sourcing. Due to the nature of the proposal, discussion is best consolidated here at the target page. Montanabw(talk) 06:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concur as there are no reliable sources that define EAST and WEST Montana from a discrete geographical perspective. At most, the two are colloquial and could be (as in the articles) defined by any whim one wants to choose. The official government designations are far more definitive and useful. --Mike Cline (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And even "the government" doesn't agree! FWP and Commerce (tourism) apparently don't like playing well together... to say nothing of other state agencies with their own regions, then add in the feds...LOL! Montanabw(talk) 18:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose, viable subjects. MB298 (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Regional designations of Montana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]