Talk:Reaction Engines LAPCAT A2

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Flight length#Long-haul flights|long distance]] The anchor (#Long-haul flights) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Great start![edit]

Congratulations to those whove been working on this article - it's is a great start. Hopefully more information will be forthcoming in the near furture. I've tried to add some features as recommended by the WP:AIR page content guidelines, and will make some more additions changes in the future, including to the text organization outline. If I change something you liked, I'd prefer you discuss it first, but I won't revert you if you revert the changes. The guidelines are just that - guidelines - they only serve to bring some uniformity to the layout of aircraft articles, but it's not set in stone. Also, I moved the page to something closer to the recommended WP:AIR naming conventions. If someone has a better idea, feel free to discuss it. We could put "Limited" in the company name, but I went for brevity. Again, this isn't a big deal, and certainly not worth edit-warring over. Thanks again for the great article! - BillCJ (talk) 02:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LAPCAT1.jpg[edit]

The image Image:LAPCAT1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brussels to sydney flight time[edit]

Just a suggestion, but perhaps someone could add the current average/fastest a commercial airplane can take passengers from brussels to sydney to give a comparison. I dont know the details but if someone else does, it would be good to add. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.143.79.252 (talk) 14:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specifications[edit]

What does that m/s mean in the "SFC:" line? It clearly doesn't mean meters per second. Enisbayramoglu (talk) 11:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It means... metres per second. See effective exhaust velocity which is equivalent to specific fuel consumption.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 01:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Windows=0 --Craigboy (talk) 08:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subsonic Sister[edit]

Can a subsonic sister plane that burns hydrogen be designed? Reducing CO₂ emissions is popular at the moment. Andrew Swallow (talk) 01:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, but it wouldn't be the same aircraft. Subsonic hydrogen jet engines are trivial (the very first jet engine was hydrogen.) Off-hand it would be likely to give good range, but it would be an equally big aircraft. Note that hydrogen is made from methane right now, and generates quite a bit of carbon dioxide.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 01:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era[edit]

Hypersonic passenger jet potentially operating in the 2050s doesn't really line up with Concorde and the Concordski, why are they listed as comparable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.81.60 (talk) 02:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Reaction Engines A2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120309142217/http://www.reactionengines.co.uk:80/lapcat_facts.html to http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/lapcat_facts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Reaction Engines A2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]