Talk:Ratatouille (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two separate games being conflated here.[edit]

Locomotive Games in Santa Clara developed a completely separate game independently of Heavy Iron. That game was for PSP only and got better reviews. Someone should clean this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.51.97.23 (talk) 02:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Future game tag[edit]

According to a website, this game was already due to be released. Wal-mart has it in stock online. Future game tag removed. Jrdaigle1000 21:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More platforms according to Gamespot and IGN[edit]

They're saying that the Mac, Mobile, and possibly the Xbox will also be getting this massively multiplatform game. JustN5:12 22:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mac and Mobile Phones will get it, it's been confirmed for months now. But the game won't be released for the original Xbox. -Mega Man 5 10 April 2007 (UTC)

It was just listed on Gamespot a few days ago, but not IGN, so you could be right. JustN5:12 17:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Plus THQ's site doesn't say anything about a regular Xbox version anywhere. In their official press release they said Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, Wii, PlayStation 2, GameCube, Game Boy Advance, Nintendo DS, PSP, PC, Mac, and Wireless. -Mega Man 5 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm....it's listed on GameStop's site. Apparently, it's an EB Games/GameStop exclusive...which means, the Xbox version is an extremely limited release rather than a full release like all the other versions. -Mega Man 5 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Heh, no Linux of course... :P 201.213.37.39 18:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Game Image[edit]

Pick one. Gamecube, PC, PS2, whatever. Please stop reverting the different game images without stating why the image is being changed around. Thx! SpikeJones 15:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The GameCube version image stays.-Mega Man 5 01 May 2007 (UTC)
PS2!(09:57, 2 May 2007) User:71.114.232.137

Please offer a constructive discussion regarding which image should be presented. Remember that WP:NOT a fan site for either platform and needs to remain unbiased in its presentation. SpikeJones 18:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a cover, and since the GC version cover is there now just leave it.-Mega Man 5 2 May 2007 (UTC)

But the PS2 cover was there in the first place. go ahead check your self. (07:26, 3 May 2007) User:71.114.232.137

But it's not there now and the GC version cover was the last one there, so the GC cover stays.-Mega Man 5 3 May 2007 (UTC)

The PC version will stay as the compromise, as there is no agreement as to why the PS2 or GC version is to be used to represent this game. If you disagree, please discuss it here first instead of reverting the image. TIA. SpikeJones 03:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. So I'll replace PC cover with the GC cover.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Care to add a legitmate reason? I'm gonna back SpikeJones up on this and go with the compromise. TheRealFennShysa 21:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why should I have to say anything? You'll just reject every word I say.Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)
And you should assume good faith, and actually try to justify your actions - assuming you have a valid reason for continually reverting, you might convince us. But for now, you have given no reason. TheRealFennShysa 21:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just so you know, that warning you gave me did very little. My status is not affected; I can still contribute information.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know, 3RR reports don't affect editors immediately. Doesn't change the fact that you've given no reason for the image you prefer to be on the page, doesn't change the fact that you did violate the rules, and doesn't change the fact that you've refused to discuss a compromise. Just so you know. TheRealFennShysa 22:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, in part so you can continue to constructively add to this discussion. Do you know what WP's policy is on identifying which game image is to be used for a given article? Or, if you would prefer, what is your reasoning behind insisting the GC version of the graphic be used instead of others? SpikeJones 22:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, let's just keep the PC version cover. However, one of the above users said "PS2" and obviously meant that the PS2 cover should stay. Maybe instead of questioning just me, you could've questioned him/her as well. Just getting after only me when I was not the only one that insisted a certain cover art should be used is just plain stupid.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Same questions apply regarding the PS2 cover, don't worry. SpikeJones 23:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, giving me a warning doesn't change the fact that I can still contribute/talk to other users. Just so you know, I'm not and won't be banned and that's a fact. Just so you know.Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Never said you would be banned. Blocked, yes. And that's what happened - hopefully you'll be willing to discuss this with others instead of demaning your way after your block wears off. TheRealFennShysa 22:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I was blocked. For 24 hours only; didn't last very long. But me being banned never happened.-Mega Man 5 14 May )2007)

This is all fine by me. (01:50, 5 May 2007) User:71.114.232.137

And it's fine by me. Mega Man 5 14 May 2007 (UTC)


System requirements, anyone? (Win XP version) I'd prefer to hear from a game owner in addition to whatever is printed on the side of the box. Zaphraud 03:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RatatouillePCgame.jpg[edit]

Image:RatatouillePCgame.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay[edit]

Someone edit this. This is not gameplay - this describes graphics! --72.12.139.231 (talk) 06:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well technically it is gameplay but its written horribly the part where it says, "...Wii looks a bit less, yet far more detailed than PS2, GameCube and Xbox and PC is middle ground between Wii and 360/PS3." Where is the cutoff supposed to be? is it after PS2, Gamecube, or XBox? --dunno how to leave user tag —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.91.71.50 (talk) 14:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ratatouille (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ratatouille (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lordtobi vandal[edit]

Someone named "Lordtobi" - deleted half of text. He is vandal! Attention to moderators!

14:23, 5 August 2019‎ Lordtobi talk contribs‎ 24,039 bytes -3,958‎ →‎Version differences: Completely unsourced WP:CHANGELOG. undo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.81.200.79 (talk)

Hi, thanks for checking by. You will find that our guidelines at WP:V and WP:CHANGELOG are enough reason to justify the aforementioned content deletion. Regards, Lordtobi (✉) 21:33, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does this game tell Ratatouille 2?[edit]

In fact, when you start the game, it starts with the recipe being stolen, but isn't that the case in the film Ratatouille? 36.72.54.38 (talk) 13:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ratatouille_(video_game)&oldid=1220043973"