Talk:Ramón Flecha

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Spain

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I have been cleaning up this article, but the tone is still not right. Added a warning template. I do not know if this person is notable enough for a Wikipedia entry. gidonb (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Gidonb. First of all thanks for your contributions. I have added citations needed in the text to improve it. About your doubt, I would like to comment you that scientific contributions referenced in the text demonstrated his notability, but I can add other references to improve it; for example references of Scientific Journals as Harvard Educational Review about his contributions; Booknote - Harvard Educational Review, Do you think that I should add this kind of content? Writer28 (talk) 10:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

I have reviewed the article based on the mentioned criteria, and I have also contributed to improve its grammar. Since the content of the article has been improved, I have removed the warning template added by Gidonb.USA2006 (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is fine with me. gidonb (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]