Talk:Rafe Esquith

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Esquith rarely mentions this, but all of his students are identified as gifted. Although, he allows students who don't qualify to be in his class to participate in afterschool activities.

I would say that the students arrive around 7 AM and leave around 4 PM. The whole 6:30AM to 5:30PM claim is an exageration.

Whoever wrote v1 of this wiki did not proofread thoroughly. There were numerous spelling and grammatical mistakes.

Having observed his classroom, I feel compelled to mention that other teachers choose his class for him and he has a fair number of students who were labelled unsalvageable by the school system. He does get a few of the students that no other teachers want. There is no "qualification" to be in his class. And, having arrived at his class at 6:45, there were already at least five students working in the classroom on different projects and lessons. Two of them greeted us at the door, offered us bottled water and gave us tours of the classroom. We left at 5:00 because we had to return to our campus, but the students were still working at Shakespeare rehearsal. Talk to the kids. They'll tell you, it isn't an exaggeration.

Central American[edit]

Is it accurate that his students are from Central America and Korea? If this is meant to include Mexico, then "Latin American" would be more accurate, since Mexico is part of North America.

Meg999 02:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare Company?[edit]

I recently saw this edit: (cur) (last) 02:41, 13 October 2007 Paul A (Talk | contribs) (3,754 bytes) (correct category tag; a person is not a theatre company) -- I must disagree with the removal of the category. While it may not be literally true that he is a theatre company, the Hobart Shakespeareans are very much associated with him personally, and I think that when searching the category for Shakespearean Companies, it is very much appropriate to include Esquith's article. KConWiki 02:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think it is appropriate to include an article about a single person in a category about companies. If it is important to give the Hobart Shakespeareans a place in that category, why not give them their own article? --Paul A 07:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would highly disagree about creating a new Hobart Shakespearean page. The group isn't notable enough to have its own article, Oldag07 (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion[edit]

I this page would greatly benefit if the book There are No Shortcuts was merged into it. The "there is no shortcuts page is very short, and honestly, the book is questionably notable when for Wikipedia standards. Moreover, it is better to have one well written page than 2 short pages, with lots of overlap. Oldag07 (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history, the page for that article ends up taking up the time of editors doing various chores, but it doesn't help the reader much. Any information there can be added here, so I'd support a merge. -- Noroton (talk) 02:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Completed merge. Late admittedly. Oldag07 (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Link[edit]

The link to Bob Edward's podcast doesn't go to the right page. (footnote 2) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dianaemiko (talk • contribs) 01:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]