Talk:Queen Ethelburga's Collegiate

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Queen Ethelburga's Collegiate is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vandalism[edit]

multiple attempts reverted, recommend locking page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.165.138 (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Statements like 'it is the most expensive school in the UK' based on a single unreliable source which does not make that claim is unhelpful. While nobody will deny that QE is expensive, the source listed just shows we are expensive compared with other schools which provide academic achievements comparable with ours - and this data is not known to be reliable. If you can find a reliable source of prices of all schools in the UK (which must include Eton, who work on the principle that if you have to ask, you can't afford it), then you will find we are not the most expensive school in England - in the mean time, we will assume you have some axe to grind and again remove this comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.92.232.164 (talk • contribs) 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. The fees have been reported in a credible secondary source and thus can be legitimately included in the article as per WP:Reliable. 81.164.228.206 (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]