Talk:Quark, Strangeness and Charm

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quark, Strangeness and Charm article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Progressive Rock Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Importance[edit]

Borderline high importance because of influence Megamanic 07:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonus tracks[edit]

The CD reissue appears to have three bonus tracks. Drutt (talk) 19:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think there have been quite a few CD re-issues featuring numerous bonus tracks, but none of these are legitimate. Esoteric Records (under the imprint Atomhenge Records) are in the process of legitimately reissuing the 1976-97 catalogue with bonus tracks - see www.cherryred.co.uk/atomhenge. I haven't seen any track details. — Drwhawkfan (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THe CD issue I have was official, and has NO extra tracks, as Drhawkfan say, other re-issues have appear, sometimes with Amazing Sounds. with all sorts of "extras" --C Hawke (talk) 07:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you're lucky enough to have the Virgin CD issue (I'm still on vinyl, and happy too), then keep hold of it because I think it will be superior to the dynamic range compression of these forthcoming releases. If anyone knows details of the various counterfeits, it may be worth adding to the release history with accompanying note about their, err, illegitimacy, just for the readers to know. — Drwhawkfan (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Quark, Strangeness and Charm/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start:

Y A reasonably complete infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
Y A track listing
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C:

Y All the start class criteria
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B:

Y All the C class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS

I rated this a C, though it's close to a B. The only real problem is that the references are inadequate. The citations need article names, or at least page references. See WP:CITE. It could use more references, in general, though. Also, I'd like to see an expansion of prose, maybe some discussion of recording? -Freekee (talk) 01:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 03:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quark, Strangeness and Charm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090314000402/http://www.cherryred.co.uk:80/atomhenge/product.php?display=atomcd2009 to http://www.cherryred.co.uk/atomhenge/product.php?display=ATOMCD2009

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Quark, Strangeness and Charm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chartstats.com/artistinfo.php?id=2334
Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66nj3bKSP?url=http://www.starfarer.net/dbrcint_77.html to http://www.starfarer.net/dbrcint_77.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]