Talk:Postcards from the Edge (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On what grounds is this rated highly important? What's the big film history ooomph here? Daniel Case 05:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

The plot of this movies has obviously been written by a fan and does sound like an article of an encyclopedia. Also the trivia section states that because a wig is being pulled from Reynolds's head during another movie, showing hair under the wig, proves she is not bald. It's a movie, you can easily have a wig under a wig. The whole tone of the plot as written here here is like that. It should be changed. There is also no explanation about what Debbie Reynolds has to do in this article. It should be noted that she is the author's mother and Doris Mann is loosely based on her. Dollvalley 10:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Postcards from the edge.jpg[edit]

Image:Postcards from the edge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Postcards27.jpg[edit]

Image:Postcards27.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia[edit]

This article has the following in its trivia section:

  • Scenes were filmed with John Cusack playing one of Vale's friends in rehab that belonged to the Manson Family. (In the novel, "Mark" has ties to Manson; Suzanne seems okay with Mark, but Alex is alternately offended and scared.) His scenes were later cut.

Is this really very important? If so, feel free to put it back into the article, but please incorporate this into the main article.

  • Though the scene in the hospital room where Doris Mann is not wearing a wig shows her as practically bald, the fight scene during TV's These Old Broads, where Debbie Reynolds's wig is pulled from her head, makes it obvious that Reynolds actually has a full and lustrous head of hair. (Fisher also notes that Reynolds is not bald in the DVD commentary.)

Shouldn't this be in the article Debbie Reynolds?

  • The song "I'm Checkin' Out," nominated for an Academy Award, was due to be sung by Reba McEntire at the awards show. The week before the show, on March 16 1991, her road manager and seven members of her band were killed in a plane crash. She went ahead and appeared on the program and dedicated the performance to them.

Should this be in this article? - Tbsdy lives (talk) 10:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Differences from novel?[edit]

Just for fun I picked up the book today and read it (why do I always get to the novels AFTER the film comes out?!).

The novel is just un-film-able. Woody Allen might have been able to do it, but he might've said, "Dang! This is talky!" The book is just people musing about life.

The changes show that smart people optioned and adapted this material. Is any talk about that appropriate? The film entry for this book mentions NONE of this. I haven't checked the credits, but whomever adapted this for the screen did a brilliant job. The whole "Mother/Daughter" thing is not a big deal in the book; it's a huge deal in the film.

Jfulbright (talk) 05:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The screenplay was also done by Carrie Fischer, so she is essentially adapting from her own work.

--Clarence.yu (talk) 09:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]