This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
The article covers events only up to 2009, when the case was remanded to the District court for trial. The circuit court only held that the case could not be thrown out altogether before actual trial. . The issue had not then been resolved. Has it been since?
The facts statement states facts which appear to lend weight to one side or another of the case. Are the facts stipulated by both parties. If so, it should be stated. Otherwise, is each point proposed by one of the parties, or decided by the court? Given that this was only a decision on summary judgment, has the court actually said that anything is actually fact? Could they, before it reaches trial. DGG ( talk ) 05:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}