Talk:Plant Varieties and Seeds Act 1964

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plant Varieties and Seeds Act 1964 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Start‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citing Hansard[edit]

Regarding this edit, WP:MOSLAW says that we should cite legal materials " according to the generally accepted citation style for the relevant jurisdictions". It suggests using the most common citation style, which in this case might be OSCOLA. I think it will probably be something along the lines of what I wrote (which was admittedly from memory). If a template is really necessary, we could use {{Cite Hansard}} or {{Ukhansard}}. Since Hansard is a paper publication that has been digitized, I think it might be preferable to cite the paper version, which I imagine might be more authoritative than the online version. James500 (talk) 05:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]