Talk:Pitt Meadows

Vancouver Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vancouver, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VancouverWikipedia:WikiProject VancouverTemplate:WikiProject VancouverVancouver articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / Communities Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Fair use rationale for Image:Pitt Meadows BC blazon.jpg[edit]

Image:Pitt Meadows BC blazon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pitt Meadows BC flag.jpg[edit]

Image:Pitt Meadows BC flag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pitt Meadows BC herald.jpg[edit]

Image:Pitt Meadows BC herald.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename page[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move.

Proposed rename: Pitt Meadows, British Columbia → Pitt Meadows Pitt Meadows currently redirects to Pitt Meadows, British Columbia. There is no Pitt Meadows (disambiguation) page; other uses of Pitt Meadows in page names are either secondary to the community or used in composite names. As the place name is evidently unique and primary, it is proposed to simplify the page name per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE. Dl2000 (talk) 03:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. - DigitalC (talk) 07:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support; an internet search suggests that, despite restricting a query to non-BC occurrences of "Pitt Meadows", results are still strongly associated with this city. Mind matrix 14:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Statistical data[edit]

To answer the question posed here: "Why are we reverting the most up to date census data - IP's data is correct." you have to look at the anon's edit history where the anon replaced data 1) without explanation and 2) in many cases changed 2011 statistics with data from an unknown location. After a half dozen reviews and reverts I just started reverting all. I'm sorry if the anon got one or two right and I reverted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lots of useful historical detail here[edit]

See 30 years of Pitt elections, Leslie Norman, Maple Ridge News, November 6 2014.Skookum1 (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge name corrected[edit]

The bridge image is of the Pitt River Bridge, not the Golden Ears. Correction made. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 14:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Pitt Meadows Cenotaph.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]