Talk:Pioneer High School (Ann Arbor, Michigan)/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

NPOV

I tagged this article with a NPOV because it seems to be bloating about many of the accomplishments at Pioneer without using a neutral point of view. If someone who is more familiar with this high school wishes to rid the article of these NPOV violations feel free. --Popcorn2008 16:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Then why not add a criticism section? *cough* Mr.White?--Coolbho3000 (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Because we write each paragraph with a balanced tone. No need for criticism. Toddst1 (talk) 02:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Examples...

The article seems fairly neutral to me. I understand a lot of accomplishments are stated, but isn't that the point of the article. I think they are conveyed in a objective manner for the most part. Can you provide some examples of the boasting? --Balldontlie 10 August 2006

I've done my part to super-neutralize it... I particularly focused on the second paragraph. If someone else want's to remove the tag, they can just point to their reasoning. I simply don't plan to be the one to remove the tag, I'm cautious like that (despite Wikipedia's "Be Bold!" policy ;) ) ~Gertlex 03:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Since I added the tag I'll remove it for you, it looks better thanks Gertlex. Popcorn2008 19:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)