Talk:Picos de Europa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Origin of name[edit]

Interesting controversy as to origin of the name (translated into English as "The Peaks of Europe"). I personally doubt that the origin stated as a fact is true, although I am sure that the the reference has been in use since time immemorial, which in itself does not make it any truer. We clearly need someone to find a reference... Ships reaching Europe from America in the early days of its discovery would surely have headed for Cádiz and Seville, in which case the Picos would almost certainly not have been visible from the sea (too much distance and other mountain ranges in between). Ships returning to Galicia (didn't Columbus return there?)or Portugal (Oporto?) may possibly have seen the Picos, in which case ... Looking forward to feedback on this one. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Which controversy? there is no controversy just because a user thinks there is. In Spain everyone is aware of this most possibly true origin of the name. And it's been in use since the sixtheen century. Not since "time immemorial". In roman times the name was different. You know... we have a looong history here and we know about it. And the ships only returned to Galicia or Cadiz? WTF? Of course it is IMPOSSIBLE to see the peaks from Galicia. But there is a sea called "Bay of Biscay" with some big ports on it. Did you know that? do you know about Gijón, Avilés, Santander, Laredo, Cantabria... these are important ports and were important ports back in the 16th century, and for sure many ships returned from the Americas each year for centuries. And in fact, the first sight of Europe these ships had were the Picos.David (talk) 18:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings David, no need to get so upset about it! All I did was suggest that someone add a reference and you have since done so. It is precisely to prevent any controversy that things get referenced at Wikipedia. And of course, even though they are referenced does not necessarily mean they are true, nor does the fact that everyone "knows" something ... but that's a debate for another day. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC) PS. Read the new reference that you yourself have added, it does in fact cast doubts as to the origins of the name. Oh, and I have been visiting both Gijón and Los Picos two or three times a year, for over 25 years, and know all about the indianos, etc.[reply]
    • Cheers! I agree there is no need to be upset. I was upset because the other user marked the sentence as "total nonsense" without even knowing anything about the matter, which is a very well spread thing in Spain. Of course I understand that this is no absolute truth, only the most told theory, may be I didn't word it properly, I think it is now perfect. Thank you for your collaboration and enjoy Asturies! :) David (talk) 08:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:SotresPanorama.jpg to appear as POTD soon[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:SotresPanorama.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 25, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-12-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 22:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picos de Europa
The peaks of the Central Massif overlook the village of Sotres in Cabrales, located in the Picos de Europa, a mountain range in northern Spain forming part of the Cantabrian Mountains. The name (literally: "Peaks of Europe") is believed to derive from being the first European landforms visible to mariners arriving from the Americas.Photo: Mick Stephenson

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Picos de Europa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]