Talk:Piano Improvisations Vol. 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:CoreaPianoImprov1.jpg[edit]

Image:CoreaPianoImprov1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

@Jazzanddarkmatter: I'd love some help getting the leads clarified! The thing I don't like about doing it this way is seven counts A.R.C. and six doesn't, and I couldn't find a good source to give a count. TlonicChronic (talk) 03:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I think my attempt to “number” Chick’s stuff is doomed to failure- ex. some people see “Return to Forever” as a solo album (as it is credited on the cover), and some don’t. His discography is challenging! Jazzanddarkmatter (talk) 04:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely agree! For jazz, I've exclusively been using "solo" to mean unaccompanied, not solely credited, but I still had a hard time trying to clean up those pages. I didn't know whether or not to credit ARC to all three, or whether or not to state Return to Forever is a Return to Forever album. The "effective debut" seemed good enough, and I couldn't do better. I definitely liked your changes to ARC, I hope my edits were in line with your intentions. TlonicChronic (talk) 04:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you wanted them numbered, what if we went through and numbered them by label? I think it would be easier to count and harder to dispute. TlonicChronic (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]