This article was nominated for deletion on 2 March 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
As noted in the article, he's an economics professor who originated a distinction in goods classification. He's linked to from the two articles in question, but no article is given. A quick search of Google Scholar turned up a fair number of articles and citations to his work, and quick search of SUNY turned up his emeritus status. Voila... a stub.
My assumption is that since he was linked, it implied his work was noteworthy enough for a brief article. Someone who knows more should flesh it out. Abb3w 20:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
this is just enough to escape speedy, since it does assert notability . It is probably not quite enough to main it in WP without at the very least some idea of what he has published. Stubs are valid even if not sourced, by the way, per WP:STUB. DGG (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
