Talk:Philippe Van Parijs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested move request[edit]

The following request to move a page has been added to Wikipedia:Requested moves as an uncontroversial move, but this has been contested by one or more people. Any discussion on the issue should continue here. If a full request is not lodged within five days of this request being contested, the request will be removed from WP:RM.Stemonitis 11:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Philippe Van Parijs needs to be moved to Philippe van Parijs - cf. Dutch article on this philosopher. --Brz7 02:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Contested: just because Dutch has this with the lower-case "v" doesn't mean it's correct. All other languages have it with the capital "V". —METS501 (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Well in Dutch the "v" is always lower case (and Philippe van Parijs is a Dutch name) and not alphabetised under "v" but e.g. under "G" in case of Vincent van Gogh. --Brz7 02:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • In the Netherlands, yes. In Belgium, the spellings of surnames are very inconsistent and can be written as one word (e.g. Vanhecke), or with "tussenvoegsels" capitalised (e.g. Van Hemele). Melsaran (formerly Salaskаn) 03:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
          • Yes, there are quite some inconsistencies in this topic I see :) Interesting.. When written as one word there's no confusion (though you'll have to know whether it's one word or not when you hear somebody saying the name). But otherwise there's a wide variety. "Van" directly refers to origin (and not to "the origin", the actual place (etc.) that follows after "van") and the minor/major case indicates the importance a culture/person gives to origin. Just found Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people). This page could maybe use more information/examples on this topic. --Brz7 10:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More about his basic income-philosophy perhaps[edit]

Since he is the most well-know spokesman for basic income it would perhaps be good with a description of his basic income theory. For example, why does he think that basic income is fair? Why he calls himself a real libertarian or left-libertarian. One thing that makes him stand out from many others in the field is that he argues that those who has a paid job recieves extra benefits which is over and above the netwage that they would have had, had the market been clean (a pure Walrasian economics). He calls this extra benefit, which people get, for a job rent or employment rent. It is fair to take the jobrent from those who work and distribute it to everyone, since the jobrent is an extra payment which is over and above the correct market wage. Except the jobrent he also views other sources as legitimate for a basic income, including sources natural resources (as in Alaska Permanent Fond). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mats33 (talkcontribs) 18:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Philippe Van Parijs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]