This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Per WP:CRYSTAL, I have restored this article to reflect the reality of things, which is the fact that this man is still Bishop of Paisley until his installation ceremony on 8 September. He is Archbishop-designate and the see of Paisley is not vacant, he is its Apostolic Administrator. Once he is enthroned in the installation ceremony, then his reign in Glasgow begins and the infoboxes can be updated to that effect. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Particularly in light of his designate status, surely the recent controversy around his comments on the death of David Cairns should be featured? They don't particularly fit under the heading 'Episcopate', and are what he is mainly known for in public, so I think a sub-heading is appropriate. Feel free to let me know if you disagree. Marty jar (talk) 21:36, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough giving it its own heading. We cannot use the Daily Mail for anything controversial though. --John (talk) 22:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That seems entirely sensible...but then in the Daily Mail, everything is controversial...Marty jar (talk) 19:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
