Talk:Philip Mond

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Created the talk-page for the Philip Mond article - Enjoy! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drbogdan (talk • contribs) 22:00, 16 December 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

"See also" Section OK - or Not?[edit]

FWIW - seems that the "See also" section is not ok by one editor - however, others may disagree - After all, according to "WP:OWN", "All Wikipedia content ... is edited collaboratively" - Further, according to "WP:ALSO" => "The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics." - Nonetheless, the following listing was deleted, without discussion, by "User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz":

Copied from the March 12, 2015 version of "Philip Mond#See also:

See also
The following listing includes directors also known for adult erotic films:

Andrew Blake

Fashion photography

Glamour photography

Helmut Newton

Henry Paris

James Avalon

Marc Dorcel

Mario Salieri

Max Candy

Michael Ninn

Tinto Brass

Is the edit deletion *entirely* OK - or Not? - Comments Welcome - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the removal is OK. As I pointed out, inclusion of such a list is clearly contrary to consensus practice. The "see also" sections in Robert Altman and Frank Capra don't include links to selected other directors. The "see also" sections in Peyton Manning and Joe Montana don't include links to selected other quarterbacks. The "see also" sections in Gabriel Garcia Marquez and John Steinbeck don't include links to selected other writers. If you want to promote your favorite porn directors (and there's no other evident inclusion criterion here), then clutter up your userspace. It's certainly not appropriate in a BLP. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 15:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: Thank you for your comments - and considered opinion - others may (or may not) agree with you - the issue is the article content - and worthy related articles in a "See also" section - and not otherwise - in any case - Thanks again for your comments - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: BRIEF Followup - seems your noted concerns (and/or opinions? and/or POVs?) may be groundless re "WP:MOS" (& related) afaik atm based on relevant detailed discussions presented earlier, including those re "WP:BLP" (see links below) - besides your opinion(s) (and related "WP:CHERRY" and/or "WP:Cherrypicking"), is there anything more substantial in the "WP:MOS" (or related) that better supports your POV? - so far - I've not found anything - but perhaps you can? - if interested, related detailed discussions can be found at several links, including the following:

PS - Incidently, some of my favorite directors atm seem to be the same as your own - and include Robert Altman and Frank Capra (as well as Fellini, Kubrick, Kurosawa and Tarkovsky).
In any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]