Talk:Phi Josephson junction

To Do[edit]

Was φ JJ also realized in S-CNT-S or s-QuDot-S devices? I remember DiFrancesci was mentioning this. Check. EdwardGoldobin (talk) 09:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May be it is a good idea to split φ JJ and φ0 JJ? or introduce two clearly different sections with different cpr and implementations. because now it is mixed up a bit. Also, double sine-Gordon is directly related to φ JJ, but not to φ0 JJ//E.G.

Varphi or Phi ?[edit]

Why is φ prounounced "varphi" and not "phi"? The LaTeX command for φ is "varphi" but the lower case Greek letter is pronounced "phi". It seems silly to use the LaTeX command as the name for the letter. I suggest to change the title of the page to "Phi Josephson junction". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brienanni (talk • contribs) 21:41, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it should be Phi Josephson junction. I will wait for several days and then move it (hopefully I will not forget).--Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]