This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
A fact from Peter Janssens appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the composer Peter Janssens subtitled his Menschensohn (Son of man) a "Sacro-Pop-Musical"?
Is such a vast list of his works needed? Since not one single one of them has been deemed notable enough for either an article or a red link, I think this is vastly over the top. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing in Wikipedia is needed. I simply took it from the German Wikipedia, but shall take a look. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looked: he has 138 individual pages in the German National Library, only about forty are listed: plays, cantatas, song books. We could debate about a hit selection, but then he is one of few for whom such a thing was published. He was productive, and the list is also a list of stations of his life and his otopics. Readers who are not interested can just look away, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like undue weight is given to these works, especially as none of them are deemed notable for English language Wikipedia. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A German children's musical is hardly likely to get an article in the English Wikipedia, but it may be good to know that he wrote several, for example, + the authors he set, + the topics, including the Latin American connection. The list has weight, agreed, but I can't follow "undue". - I would understand your concern if it was just a list of titles in German. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The concern is borne out in the fact that none of these are notable enough. A massive list of non-notable works is not what Wikipedia articles should contain. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would follow if these were single songs, but - repeating - they are substantial and notable works such as oratorios and song books. I would refer readers to the German Wikipedia if it was just a collection of titles, but they would have a hard time reading the descriptions there. This is an offer, not something needed. I could render it in prose but I read structured information much better. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gerda Arendt is from my point of view completly right. Especially in behalf of his oratories Peter Janssens is a very notable composer, who should be mentioned in the english wikipedia as well as for example Karl Jenkins in the German Wikipedia. Kind regards--Ἀστερίσκος (talk) 09:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not denying the article should exist, I'm stating that listing dozens and dozens of non-notable works is not appropriate. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A list of substantial compositions by a notable composer is encyclopedic. WP:Source list has no explicit demands on notability of entries; what gets listed depends on context and consensus. Even WP:Stand-alone lists#Common selection criteria allows for lists where "Every entry in the list fails the notability criteria." I think the list in this article is helpful. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine, I'm in a minority, but it's listcruft, a huge swath of non-notable works. If it's so important, a list article should be created with all 138 works. But I suspect that would be deleted as non-notable. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
...correspondent to the German proverb: Nicht alles, aber soviel wie möglich. Kind regards--Ἀστερίσκος (talk) 09:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
