This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article reads like a high school essay rather than an encyclopedia article. It relies too heavily on random quotes from academics (including quotes of questions posed by academics!) and has a prose style that isn’t suitable for Wikipedia. Beyond that, there are many grammatical errors, sentence fragments and parts that just don’t make sense at all. The content overall is worth keeping but it needs a lot of rework.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.255.135.198 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dear anon in Vietnam, thanks, but no thanks. You do not know what you are talking about: if you see minor errors you think need correcting, then you can fix that, As for tone, etc., please see WP:SUMMARY. Cheers, ——Serial 17:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anon in Vietnam is actually pretty right about that, Serial Number 54129 (talk·contribs). Also, I found indirect quotes in which one academic is quoting another, and an in-text reference to "Duke" while the citation is to "Dukes". I also second the finding of verbosity. I am flagging the article as in need of expert attention for focus and incomplete citations (who is Duke or Dukes?) It also still needs an edit for pervasive incorrect verb tenses, but I just don't have time for that especially since it will still need an edit for focus and citations. Elinruby (talk) 01:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
(Struck text because apparently I had overlooked the bibliography, and much as I dislike the citation style, I believe it is considered acceptable. Please do prune it for relevancy however if this seems applicable) Elinruby (talk) 01:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that pruning would be nice; perhaps to around 8,000 words is possible? SN54129 14:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
