Talk:PSR B1829−10
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
size[edit]
A pulsar 20 times bigger than the Sun? 77.49.176.134 (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
excised exoplanetbox[edit]
| Orbital characteristics | |
|---|---|
| 0.7 | |
| Eccentricity | 0.1 |
| 182.62125 | |
I have excised this planetbox because the planet is not real, it is an artefact of Earth's orbit, that was uncorrected for in the initial analysis. Therefore it misleadingly makes it appear that there is a planet associated with this pulsar. 70.55.87.49 (talk) 04:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Why the move?[edit]
Why having moved the page for PSR B1829-10 to PSR B1829−10? What makes me understand even less is that the - signs in the article have not been changed to − signs. Odd. CielProfond (talk) 06:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on PSR B1829−10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515194624/http://super.abril.com.br/superarquivo/1991/conteudo_112785.shtml to http://super.abril.com.br/superarquivo/1991/conteudo_112785.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)