Talk:P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This is how the article, as of July 15, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Good here, but major problems are in the lead section. It reads almost word for word with the Recording section. The lead should be a summary, and shouldn't pull so heavily from the main text. For example, it needn't be mentioned in the lead section that LaToya and Janet were in the guise of PYTs.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Very well referenced. Good job here.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pretty thorough. I would only say that maybe some more reviews for the 2008 version would be nice.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
I'm going to pass this. But the lead issue and the reviews need to addressed if this is to become a featured article. Thank you for your work so far.— Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)