Talk:Oxnead
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oxnead article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled comment[edit]
I think the introduction does adequately summarise the article and propose to remove the box that calls for a better introduction. Any objections to this? Mscprm (talk) 07:37, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Information on the Paston Family[edit]
I was unsure how you would want to edit this information so I am going to leave it here.
- Sir William Paston the nephew of Clement Paston that inherited his lands had a son Erasmus Paston.
- Erasmus was the heir of his father William Paston.
- Eramus died before his father so his son and heir William Paston became his grandfather's heir.
- William's heir was his son Christopher Paston.
- Christopher's son Edmund Paston (1585-1632) was his heir.
- Edmund's son William (1610-1663) was his heir.[1][2]
I noticed that you have William the nephew listed as the father of Sir Edmund Paston Knt. Christopher was the father of Sir Edmund.
LauraDeSpain (talk) 02:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Blomefield, Francis. "Hundred of South Erpingham: Oxnead." An Essay Towards A Topographical History of the County of Norfolk: Volume 6. London: W Miller, 1807. 477-496. British History Online. Web. 3 May 2020. http://www.british-history.ac.uk/topographical-hist-norfolk/vol6/pp477-496.
- ^ Hundred of South Erpingham: Oxnead
List of lost settlements in Norfolk[edit]
Oxnead is not mentioned at List of lost settlements in Norfolk: should it be added? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)