Talk:Operational risk management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 October 2018 and 11 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yt1416.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganization[edit]

Proposal of strategy to re-organize the article

Mission[edit]

The goal of this article is to identify and explain the processes of risk management in terms the general public can easily understand while providing ample references to substantiate the article and allow further in-depth research of the subject.

Structure[edit]

  • Summarize ORM as a consensus of various documented ORM processes. Identify ORM as a process that has been documented in various publications.
  • Briefly describe each of the major steps of the process with links to Main article when applicable. For example, Risk assessment is a major step and has its own main article.
  • Provide a section on use anapplicability with examples in private enterprise and government.
  • Provide a section to identify documented ORM processes. A brief comparitive review or abridged history would be a nice compliment. Each of the documented processes may have its own main article. This could include external links.
  • Provide a reference section using listref

Resources[edit]

These following are possible ORM references:

The following are possible risk assessment references:

  • Delphi documentation, see Delphi method
  • NIST SP 800-30, NIST SP 800-66 [3], NIST SP 800-50[4]
  • Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE)
  • Facilitated Risk Analysis Process (FRAP)

Scope of Article[edit]

One thing that I think this definition is missing is calling out specific risk around complying with government regulations. This is specifically a huge issue in the US as it relates to not selling to US government denied parties, US government embargoed countries, and also proper export licensing on certain products to satisfy US governement export restrictions. --Jzupan (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the feedback. The focus of this article is to define ORM, not create a list of all the different kinds of risk that the human imagination can fathom. Discussion of specific risks belongs in the tree of artices stemming from Risk. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 18:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Software[edit]

This section contains blatantly false statements, specifically this one: "Up till now there is not much commercial software focusing on operational risk management." A simple Google search on operational risk management software confirms that this statement is wrong. As I said in my correction, Forrester Research recently released a study that examined 115 software vendors in the Governance, Risk, and Compliance space, which is a superset of Operational Risk Management. And if you don't want to plug software, fine, but your plug of the open source solution should follow the same guidelines. --Jzupan (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • This section has been the target of plugs and advertisements. I could use help in policing this section to keep it neutral and within the Wikipedia guidelines. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 18:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operational risk management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]