Talk:openEHR

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Wolandscat (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (Declaration)

Evaluation of OpenEHR[edit]

The first part about the definition of OpenEHR is not enough information. The clearer definition needs to be provided for the readers. As the explanation quite plain, the relevant diagram showing the data how to exchanged should be also right next to the first paragraph. Since the information regarding the OpenEHR foundation not relevant to the definition, this part will be removed from the first part. The title for the first part is missing as well.

The issues about OpenEHR Foundation will be addressed at the second part. As the data could be accessed by other authorized clinicians around the world,it would be beneficial for the readers to have some ideas of related medical-legal issue.

The second part will be changed to the third part and needs more appropriate title to instruct the readers.It also need to address where the data comes from and who could be involved in updating the clinical information. To make it more understandable for layperson, few diagrams could be provided as well.

For the third part, it needs to be added more information regarding which countries are using the OpenEHR and how to use it.

The last part of the article is quite confusing. Obviously there are much information about Clinical Knowledge Management needs to add in order to clearly state what that is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yajing Yang (talk • contribs) 08:11, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]