This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
There have been countless publications which have used OpenBCI devices (as they are a staple in low-density/low-cost EEG research), so the "may not meet notability" banner is a bit weird to see (although the article would benefit from some improvement). There's a publication list here: https://docs.openbci.com/citations/
I agree. As of now, there are citations going back 10 years, and there are plenty of new studies published this year. More work does need to be done, but there is clear evidence for notability here. Jcstr (talk) 23:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
