Talk:Oliver Rathkolb

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Political background[edit]

Actually Rathkolb is more of a political agitator for the dominating socialist party and the political left in general rather then a serious historian. Often seen and heared on the state media (ORF, Austrian Broadcast), which is called by many Austrians Rotfunk (Red Broadcast).--80.240.225.83 (talk) 08:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You left the same message at de:Diskussion:Oliver Rathkolb#Politische Prägung. It's unclear what exactly you want to change in this article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source is missing[edit]

I have just removed an external link to a resource that is no longer available. It is also not recoverable by the use of the wayback machine. It might, however, be possible to find the source within the print version of the magazine

Nevermind, the german version of the article had a link to a working archive. -- Lpd-Lbr (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]